Saturday, December 18, 2004


Evolution is made of amateurs, as 99.9% of us humans are amateurs about the organization of knowledge.

Yes, it’s amateur to note that there’s no inherent order to knowledge (a social construction), and any inherency to social construction is constructed, while constructibility is inestimably various and any coherency of variability is various, and any discourse of variability is, at best, part of the “colony” [the academic buzz] of discursive formations in the evolution of discursivity).

Thus, you may see that Hegel, too, was an amateur. And Darwin, thus Marx, thus Habermas, certainly myself (as I emplace myself in such a lineage!—which only an amateur would do).

Smile! There’s no one ultimately watching (save the god you may have constructed).